How many renters in Rolling Hills Estates, CA pay more than 30% of their income on rent?
46.1% (±20.3 points) of renting households in Rolling Hills Estates, CA spend 30% or more of their household income on gross rent (2020–2024 American Community Survey).
30.0% spend 35% or more.
The median renting household spends 28.7% of its income on rent.
Figures last updated on .
- Paying 30% or more
- 46.1% (±20.3 points)
- Paying 35% or more
- 30.0% (±15.1 points)
- Median share of income
- 28.7% (±5.5 points)
Rent as a share of income in Rolling Hills Estates
| Share of income spent on rent | Rolling Hills Estates | Los Angeles County | California | United States |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Less than 15% | 0.0% (±14.4 points) | 9.5% | 10.4% | 12.6% |
| 15% to 19.9% | 18.7% (±14.0 points) | 10.6% | 11.1% | 12.2% |
| 20% to 24.9% | 20.5% (±14.1 points) | 11.4% | 12.0% | 12.6% |
| 25% to 29.9% | 14.7% (±11.1 points) | 10.8% | 11.2% | 11.5% |
| 30% to 34.9% | 16.1% (±13.6 points) | 9.3% | 9.3% | 9.2% |
| 35% or more | 30.0% (±15.1 points) | 48.3% | 46.0% | 41.9% |
Households whose income could not be measured against their rent (for example, those reporting no income) are left out of these shares, as the Census Bureau leaves them out.
Rolling Hills Estates against Los Angeles County, its state and the nation
| Rolling Hills Estates | Los Angeles County | California | United States | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Paying 30% or more | 46.1% (±20.3 points) | 57.6% (±0.4 points) | 55.3% (±0.2 points) | 51.1% |
| Paying 35% or more | 30.0% (±15.1 points) | 48.3% (±0.3 points) | 46.0% (±0.2 points) | 41.9% |
| Median share of income | 28.7% (±5.5 points) | 34.1% (±0.2 points) | 32.8% (±0.2 points) | 30.6% |
| Median renter household income | $157,216 (±$107,394) | $66,677 (±$463) | $71,186 (±$298) | $52,966 |
| Median gross rent | $3,500 or more | $1,954 (±$6) | $2,036 (±$5) | $1,413 |
In Rolling Hills Estates, the share of renters paying 30% or more of income is not measurably different from Los Angeles County (57.6%).
It is not measurably different from California (55.3%).
It is not measurably different from the national figure (51.1%).
In Los Angeles County, Rolling Hills Estates ranks 114 of 139 places with a published estimate, from highest to lowest share of renters paying 30% or more of income.
Statewide, it ranks 818 of 1,067.
Rankings use the estimates alone; where margins of error overlap, neighboring ranks may not truly differ.
Renters paying 30% or more of income in places near Rolling Hills Estates
| Place | Distance | Renters paying 30% or more of income | Compared with this place |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rolling Hills Estates | — | 46.1% (±20.3 points) | — |
| Lomita | 1.2 mi | 52.2% (±7.7 points) | Not measurably different |
| Rolling Hills | 1.7 mi | 0.0% (±90.7 points) | Not measurably different |
| West Carson | 3.6 mi | 58.8% (±9.7 points) | Not measurably different |
| Rancho Palos Verdes | 3.7 mi | 47.8% (±8.4 points) | Not measurably different |
| Torrance | 4.0 mi | 52.9% (±3.4 points) | Not measurably different |
| Palos Verdes Estates | 5.7 mi | 79.4% (±17.4 points) | Higher |
| Carson | 6.2 mi | 52.9% (±5.8 points) | Not measurably different |
| Redondo Beach | 6.5 mi | 46.8% (±4.3 points) | Not measurably different |
Nearby places with a measurably higher figure: Palos Verdes Estates, CA (79.4%).
Distance is measured in a straight line between the Census Bureau’s internal points for each place.
Renters paying 30% or more of income across Los Angeles County, place by place
| Rank | Place | Renters paying 30% or more of income |
|---|---|---|
| 107 (tie) | Del Aire | 48.6% (±14.8 points) |
| 109 | Artesia | 48.1% (±10.7 points) |
| 110 | Rancho Palos Verdes | 47.8% (±8.4 points) |
| 111 | South San Jose Hills | 47.4% (±13.7 points) |
| 112 | Redondo Beach | 46.8% (±4.3 points) |
| 113 | South Pasadena | 46.3% (±6.7 points) |
| 114 | Rolling Hills Estates | 46.1% (±20.3 points) |
| 115 | San Marino | 45.9% (±17.3 points) |
| 116 (tie) | Sierra Madre | 45.5% (±15.7 points) |
| 116 (tie) | Valinda | 45.5% (±13.1 points) |
| 118 | Marina del Rey | 45.3% (±11.8 points) |
| 119 | Hermosa Beach | 44.8% (±8.0 points) |
| 120 | West Hollywood | 44.6% (±4.7 points) |
Showing 13 of 139 places in Los Angeles County, ranked from highest to lowest.
Survey years: 2020–2024 (American Community Survey 5-year estimates).
Margins of error are at the 90% confidence level.
What you can do on Seayora in Rolling Hills Estates
One account for renting, owning, managing and fixing homes, with these figures beside you.
Looking for a place to rent?
Browse homes for rent near Rolling Hills Estates, save the ones you like and apply online.
Browse rentals · Create a renter account
Own or manage a rental?
List it, sign the lease and collect rent online, with the figures for Rolling Hills Estates beside you.
Create a landlord account · See what landlords get
Do repairs, renovations or maintenance?
Get found by owners and renters near Rolling Hills Estates, and send estimates and invoices from your phone.
Questions about Rolling Hills Estates
Are renters in Rolling Hills Estates rent-burdened?
46.1% of renting households in Rolling Hills Estates pay 30% or more of their income in gross rent, the share housing researchers usually call rent-burdened (2020–2024 American Community Survey).
What share of income do renters in Rolling Hills Estates spend on rent?
The median renting household in Rolling Hills Estates, CA spends 28.7% (±5.5 points) of its household income on gross rent.
Sources
- Selected Housing Characteristics (DP04), 2020–2024 ACS 5-year estimates — Rolling Hills Estates city, California
- Median Gross Rent as a Percentage of Household Income (B25071), 2020–2024 ACS 5-year estimates — Rolling Hills Estates city, California
- Median Household Income by Tenure (B25119), 2020–2024 ACS 5-year estimates — Rolling Hills Estates city, California
To check these figures in the Census Bureau’s own API, request the variables below from the 2024 ACS 5-year data profile (acs/acs5/profile) and detailed tables (acs/acs5) for Rolling Hills Estates city, California (place:62644, in state:06).
Each estimate (E or PE) has a margin of error beside it (M or PM).
The API needs a free key.
DP04_0136E, DP04_0136M, DP04_0137PE, DP04_0137PM, DP04_0138PE, DP04_0138PM, DP04_0139PE, DP04_0139PM, DP04_0140PE, DP04_0140PM, DP04_0141PE, DP04_0141PM, DP04_0142PE, DP04_0142PM, B25071_001E, B25071_001M, B25119_003E, B25119_003M
This product uses the Census Bureau Data API but is not endorsed or certified by the Census Bureau.
Figures are published by the US Census Bureau, HUD, the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the FBI; Seayora reproduces them and does not adjust them, except where a sentence says it compares dollar figures after inflation. They describe the whole place, not any one building or street, and are not an appraisal, a rent determination, a tax bill, a safety rating or legal advice.
Figures last updated on .
Related
- Housing in Rolling Hills Estates at a glance
- Median rent in Rolling Hills Estates
- Rent by bedrooms in Rolling Hills Estates
- Renters and owners in Rolling Hills Estates
- Income and affordability in Rolling Hills Estates
- Home values in Rolling Hills Estates
- Homeowner costs in Rolling Hills Estates
- Property taxes in Rolling Hills Estates
- Types of homes in Rolling Hills Estates
- Bedrooms in Rolling Hills Estates
- Age of homes in Rolling Hills Estates
- Heating fuel in Rolling Hills Estates
- Commute and cars in Rolling Hills Estates
- Crime reported to police in Rolling Hills Estates
- Population growth in Rolling Hills Estates
- How long people stay in Rolling Hills Estates
- Crowding and facilities in Rolling Hills Estates
- Fair Market Rent in Rolling Hills Estates
- California landlord and tenant rules
- Housing across Los Angeles County
- California places ranked by rent burden
- Housing data for every place in California