Michigan places ranked by rent burden
438 places in Michigan have a reliable estimate of rent burden (2020–2024 American Community Survey).
Highest figures: Carrollton Township (87.3%), Selma Township (87.2%), South Haven Charter Township (85.0%).
Lowest figure: Harris Township (16.8%).
The figure for Michigan as a whole is 50.4% (±0.4 points).
Figures last updated on .
- Figure for Michigan as a whole
- 50.4% (±0.4 points)
- Places ranked
- 438
Michigan places ranked by rent burden
Villages and places inside a township, ranked by rent burden
| Rank | Place | County | Renters paying 30% or more of income |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Baldwin | Lake County | 78.9% (±14.0 points) |
| 2 | Oxford | Oakland County | 78.5% (±14.9 points) |
| 3 | Blissfield | Lenawee County | 78.1% (±34.2 points) |
| 4 | Brooklyn | Jackson County | 77.6% (±14.8 points) |
| 5 | Elkton | Huron County | 74.2% (±22.7 points) |
| 6 | Millington | Tuscola County | 70.7% (±22.8 points) |
| 7 | Manchester | Washtenaw County | 67.9% (±24.3 points) |
| 8 | Lawton | Van Buren County | 66.8% (±17.5 points) |
| 9 | Pinckney | Livingston County | 66.4% (±31.3 points) |
| 10 | White Pigeon | St. Joseph County | 65.5% (±24.0 points) |
| 11 | Cassopolis | Cass County | 64.8% (±20.7 points) |
| 12 | St. Charles | Saginaw County | 63.5% (±29.8 points) |
| 13 | Wolverine Lake | Oakland County | 62.8% (±24.0 points) |
| 14 | Lexington | Sanilac County | 59.3% (±23.7 points) |
| 15 | Edwardsburg | Cass County | 58.9% (±23.5 points) |
| 16 | Fowlerville | Livingston County | 57.9% (±18.3 points) |
| 17 | Sparta | Kent County | 56.4% (±18.4 points) |
| 18 | Lake Odessa | Ionia County | 55.2% (±26.8 points) |
| 19 | Edmore | Montcalm County | 53.4% (±18.9 points) |
| 20 | Springport | Jackson County | 52.0% (±23.5 points) |
| 21 | Mackinaw City | Emmet County | 50.8% (±17.4 points) |
| 22 | Laurium | Houghton County | 50.6% (±23.2 points) |
| 23 | Kingsley | Grand Traverse County | 50.0% (±20.7 points) |
| 24 | Calumet | Houghton County | 49.4% (±12.2 points) |
| 25 | Newberry | Luce County | 48.4% (±19.2 points) |
| 26 | Saranac | Ionia County | 48.0% (±16.3 points) |
| 27 (tie) | Howard City | Montcalm County | 47.5% (±22.9 points) |
| 27 (tie) | Milford | Oakland County | 47.5% (±15.2 points) |
| 29 | Three Oaks | Berrien County | 47.0% (±17.1 points) |
| 30 | Mattawan | Van Buren County | 46.7% (±17.8 points) |
| 31 | Shepherd | Isabella County | 46.3% (±17.8 points) |
| 32 (tie) | Bellaire | Antrim County | 45.2% (±19.3 points) |
| 32 (tie) | Nashville | Barry County | 45.2% (±21.6 points) |
| 34 | Lake Orion | Oakland County | 45.1% (±18.3 points) |
| 35 | Colon | St. Joseph County | 45.0% (±21.0 points) |
| 36 | Caledonia | Kent County | 44.8% (±14.8 points) |
| 37 (tie) | Hesperia | Oceana County | 44.0% (±18.3 points) |
| 37 (tie) | Union City | Branch County | 44.0% (±19.9 points) |
| 39 | Roscommon | Roscommon County | 43.7% (±15.6 points) |
| 40 | Bellevue | Eaton County | 41.6% (±20.2 points) |
| 41 | South Rockwood | Monroe County | 41.2% (±16.2 points) |
| 42 | Breckenridge | Gratiot County | 41.1% (±18.4 points) |
| 43 | Farwell | Clare County | 40.9% (±19.1 points) |
| 44 | L'Anse | Baraga County | 40.3% (±17.5 points) |
| 45 | Stockbridge | Ingham County | 40.0% (±18.8 points) |
| 46 | Quincy | Branch County | 39.3% (±14.5 points) |
| 47 (tie) | Dundee | Monroe County | 39.2% (±15.3 points) |
| 47 (tie) | Pigeon | Huron County | 39.2% (±15.3 points) |
| 49 | Constantine | St. Joseph County | 37.8% (±16.3 points) |
| 50 | Ontonagon | Ontonagon County | 36.1% (±16.8 points) |
| 51 | Lake Linden | Houghton County | 35.6% (±16.4 points) |
| 52 | Berrien Springs | Berrien County | 34.4% (±16.8 points) |
| 53 | Stevensville | Berrien County | 33.5% (±14.6 points) |
| 54 (tie) | Birch Run | Saginaw County | 29.7% (±11.0 points) |
| 54 (tie) | Homer | Calhoun County | 29.7% (±13.2 points) |
| 56 | Deckerville | Sanilac County | 29.5% (±12.7 points) |
| 57 | Shelby | Oceana County | 29.2% (±12.3 points) |
| 58 | Baraga | Baraga County | 27.8% (±13.1 points) |
These places lie inside a township or town whose figures include them, so they are ranked only against each other.
Unincorporated communities ranked by rent burden
| Rank | Place | County | Renters paying 30% or more of income |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Prudenville | Roscommon County | 94.5% (±21.0 points) |
| 2 | West Monroe | Monroe County | 83.9% (±26.2 points) |
| 3 | Jenison | Ottawa County | 74.0% (±14.8 points) |
| 4 | Buena Vista | Saginaw County | 70.5% (±21.2 points) |
| 5 | Skidway Lake | Ogemaw County | 66.4% (±31.9 points) |
| 6 | Westwood | Kalamazoo County | 65.2% (±14.1 points) |
| 7 | Allendale | Ottawa County | 63.9% (±11.5 points) |
| 8 | Trowbridge Park | Marquette County | 62.9% (±29.8 points) |
| 9 | Fair Plain | Berrien County | 62.4% (±13.7 points) |
| 10 | South Monroe | Monroe County | 61.9% (±12.8 points) |
| 11 | Paw Paw Lake | Berrien County | 59.3% (±24.9 points) |
| 12 | Beecher | Genesee County | 58.0% (±12.3 points) |
| 13 | Eastwood | Kalamazoo County | 55.9% (±22.3 points) |
| 14 | Edgemont Park | Ingham County | 55.8% (±23.8 points) |
| 15 | Comstock Park | Kent County | 54.8% (±11.5 points) |
| 16 | Mio | Oscoda County | 53.9% (±20.4 points) |
| 17 | Shields | Saginaw County | 50.3% (±21.8 points) |
| 18 | Bridgeport | Saginaw County | 49.8% (±19.8 points) |
| 19 | Haslett | Ingham County | 48.3% (±8.6 points) |
| 20 | Okemos | Ingham County | 48.0% (±7.4 points) |
| 21 | Holt | Ingham County | 46.8% (±8.4 points) |
| 22 | Houghton Lake | Roscommon County | 45.6% (±16.4 points) |
| 23 | Comstock Northwest | Kalamazoo County | 45.2% (±16.2 points) |
| 24 | Northview | Kent County | 45.0% (±15.1 points) |
| 25 | Kincheloe | Chippewa County | 44.3% (±13.9 points) |
| 26 | Cutlerville | Kent County | 43.3% (±10.3 points) |
| 27 | Temperance | Monroe County | 42.5% (±16.1 points) |
| 28 | Waverly | Eaton County | 38.9% (±5.5 points) |
| 29 | Forest Hills | Kent County | 38.8% (±18.0 points) |
| 30 | K. I. Sawyer | Marquette County | 34.6% (±11.4 points) |
Unincorporated communities inside a town or township are ranked only against each other, because the town’s figures include them.
How this ranking is built
A place is included when its own page for this figure is published as reliable: a coefficient of variation of 30% or less and enough surveyed homes.
438 places qualify; the rest are on their own pages with their margins, but not ranked here.
The ranking orders the estimates alone: where two places’ margins of error overlap, their ranks may not truly differ, and places at the same published figure share a rank.
A median published as a bound (“$3,500 or more”) is placed at the bound; its true place may be higher.
- Michigan places ranked by median rent
- Michigan places ranked by median home value
- Michigan places ranked by median household income
- Michigan places ranked by property taxes
- Michigan places ranked by share of renters
- Michigan places ranked by age of homes
- Michigan places ranked by rental vacancy rate
- Michigan places ranked by commute time
Survey years: 2020–2024 (American Community Survey 5-year estimates).
Margins of error are at the 90% confidence level.
What you can do on Seayora in Michigan
One account for renting, owning, managing and fixing homes, with these figures beside you.
Own or manage a rental?
List it, sign the lease and collect rent online, with the figures for Michigan beside you.
Create a landlord account · See what landlords get
Looking for a place to rent?
Browse homes for rent near Michigan, save the ones you like and apply online.
Browse rentals · Create a renter account
Do repairs, renovations or maintenance?
Get found by owners and renters near Michigan, and send estimates and invoices from your phone.
Questions about Michigan
Which place in Michigan has the highest rent burden?
Carrollton Township has the highest, 87.3% (±34.8 points) (2020–2024 American Community Survey).
Which place in Michigan has the lowest rent burden?
Harris Township has the lowest, 16.8% (±8.0 points).
What is the rent burden in Michigan?
The figure for Michigan as a whole is 50.4% (±0.4 points).
Sources
- US Census Bureau, American Community Survey 2020–2024 5-year estimates; each place’s own table is linked from its page
- Selected Housing Characteristics (DP04), 2020–2024 ACS 5-year estimates — Michigan
This product uses the Census Bureau Data API but is not endorsed or certified by the Census Bureau.
Figures are published by the US Census Bureau, HUD, the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the FBI; Seayora reproduces them and does not adjust them, except where a sentence says it compares dollar figures after inflation. They describe the whole place, not any one building or street, and are not an appraisal, a rent determination, a tax bill, a safety rating or legal advice.
Figures last updated on .